LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/FIKREMARIAM A YALEW
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 51 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew has allowed 38 of 51 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

75% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Fikremariam A Yalew has a public record of 51 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 38 were allowed and 13 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical record across decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units where they work. The allowance rate of 75% reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's history. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Different art units may have different characteristics; this aggregate does not isolate any single art unit's record.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2136
51 APPS · 75% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

75% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 60%
DISPOSITION38 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.2 moart unit avg 27.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.8 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew

  • What is Fikremariam A Yalew's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 75%, calculated from 38 allowed applications out of 51 total disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner's public record covers one art unit, which falls under Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the 75% allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its individual merits.
  • What is the examiner's subject matter?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP