Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew has allowed 38 of 51 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Fikremariam A Yalew has a public record of 51 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 38 were allowed and 13 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical record across decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units where they work. The allowance rate of 75% reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's history. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Different art units may have different characteristics; this aggregate does not isolate any single art unit's record.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Fikremariam A Yalew has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP