LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/FRANCISCO A GRULLON
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Francisco A Grullon

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 475 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Francisco A Grullon has allowed 425 of 475 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

89% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2132 · 90%AU 2182 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Francisco A Grullon maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 511 total applications, 425 were allowed and 50 abandoned, yielding 475 disposed applications. The allowance rate—the percentage of decided applications that were allowed—stands at 89% across this pooled record. This figure reflects outcomes in the examiner's assigned art units within the technology center and does not forecast any individual application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates the examiner's dispositions across multiple art units. The allowance rate and disposed-application count shown here represent historical aggregate data only. They describe past outcomes across different subject areas within TC 2100 and are not predictions about any specific application. Detailed per-art-unit data, where available separately, may provide additional context on outcomes in narrower subject areas.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
510 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION425 / 49 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY28.7 moart unit avg 41 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility20% · art unit 21%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)69%
§103 — Obviousness84% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness48%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW88%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW91%-3 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 208 decided applications with an interview and 266 without.

ART UNIT 2182
1 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION0 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.4 moart unit avg 24.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY25.6 moart unit avg 37.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility0% · art unit 31%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness0% · art unit 76%
§112 — Written description & definiteness0%

Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Francisco A Grullon

  • What is Francisco A Grullon's allowance rate?
    Over 475 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 89%. This is the share of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) that resulted in allowance, and it is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Francisco A Grullon's public record spans two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does this pooled record mean?
    The figures shown combine outcomes across both art units. They reflect the examiner's historical record and do not forecast outcomes for any individual application or predict results in any specific art unit.
  • How many applications are in this record?
    The examiner has disposed of 475 applications (425 allowed, 50 abandoned) out of 511 total applications on file.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Francisco A Grullon has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 511 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP