LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/FRANTZ B JEAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Frantz B Jean

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 188 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Frantz B Jean has allowed 168 of 188 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

89% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2151 · 87%AU 2154 · 91%AU 2155 · 95%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Frantz B Jean's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 188 disposed applications, 168 were allowed and 20 abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 89%. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 95% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art-unit assignments and reflects historical disposition data without indication of future outcomes on any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's work across multiple art units, obscuring unit-specific variation. The overall allowance rate (89%) describes past dispositions and is not a prediction for any individual application. The stated range (87% to 95%) shows variability among the examiner's art-unit assignments. These historical figures provide context for an examiner's record but do not indicate how any pending or future application will be handled.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2151
110 APPS · 87% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

87% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION96 / 14 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION32.7 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.7 moart unit avg 44.1 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW89%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW87%+2 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 19 decided applications with an interview and 91 without.

ART UNIT 2154
58 APPS · 91% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

91% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION53 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION32.2 moart unit avg 27.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.3 moart unit avg 41.9 mo
ART UNIT 2155
20 APPS · 95% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

95% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION19 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION14 moart unit avg 27.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY26.6 moart unit avg 42.2 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Frantz B Jean

  • What is Frantz B Jean's allowance rate?
    The overall allowance rate is 89%, based on 188 disposed applications (168 allowed, 20 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's record spans 3 art units (2151, 2154, 2155) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 95% across the examiner's art units. This pooled record aggregates all units and does not attribute specific rates to individual units.
  • What does this pooled record mean for my application?
    The pooled record shows the examiner's historical allowance rate across multiple art units. It is not a prediction of any pending application's outcome and does not indicate how any specific case will be examined or decided.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Frantz B Jean has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 188 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP