Examiner Gabriel L Chu has allowed 703 of 849 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Gabriel L Chu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 849 disposed applications, 703 received an allowance decision, corresponding to an 83% allowance rate. The remaining 146 applications were abandoned. A total of 863 applications appear in the complete record, including pending matters. This pooled figure aggregates data from art units 2114 and 2184 and reflects historical dispositions only.
A pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. This figure describes what occurred over a past set of decided applications and does not function as a prediction for any individual pending matter. The breadth—here, two art units—reflects the examiner's assignment across different subject areas within TC 2100. Aggregate statistics describe the record, not the prospects of a specific case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 230 decided applications with an interview and 617 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gabriel L Chu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 863 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP