Examiner Gabriella Kanani Shelton

What the data says.

Gabriella Kanani Shelton maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 58 total applications, 31 were allowed and 6 were abandoned, yielding 37 disposed applications. The allowance rate over those 37 decided applications is 84%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record across all assigned art units and does not reflect any specific pending application.

How to read these numbers.

This record pools decisions across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate is calculated from applications that have been decided (allowed or abandoned), excluding any pending matters. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and are correlational data only—not predictions about any individual application's outcome. Art-unit composition and technology-center context provide background for understanding the record's scope.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

Questions about Examiner Gabriella Kanani Shelton

• 01What is Examiner Shelton's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 84%, calculated from 37 disposed (decided) applications across the examiner's public record.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record spans one art unit. Figures shown are aggregated across all art units assigned to the examiner.
• 03What does the allowance rate measure?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of applications that were allowed, measured against all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned). It excludes pending applications and is a historical figure, not a prediction.
• 04What technology area does this examiner cover?

  The examiner works in TC 2100, covering Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.