Examiner Garrett A Smith

What the data says.

Garrett A Smith maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 105 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 46 and abandoned 59, yielding an allowance rate of 44% over the decided pool. The record spans a single art unit (2168). This allowance rate describes the examiner's historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes in any specific pending application.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units in TC 2100. The 44% allowance rate is a historical average calculated from all decided applications—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending filings. Aggregate figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions about any individual application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Garrett A Smith

• 01What is Garrett A Smith's overall allowance rate?

  44%, computed from 46 allowed applications and 59 abandoned applications (105 total decided). This is a historical average and not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  One art unit (2168) within TC 2100. The pooled record aggregates all dispositions across that unit.
• 03What is the technology center and subject matter?

  Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The record covers applications in this field.
• 04What do these statistics tell me about my specific application?

  These figures describe the examiner's past record only. Historical allowance rates are not predictions of any individual application's outcome.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.