LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Gary J Koo

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 50 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2011
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Gary J Koo has allowed 21 of 50 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

42% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2168 · 43%AU 2169 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Gary J Koo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 50 disposed applications, 21 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, corresponding to an allowance rate of 42%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity across multiple art units within TC 2100 and reflects past dispositions only. The record covers decided applications; pending matters are excluded from both the numerator and denominator of the allowance rate.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's history across multiple art units within a single technology center. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and does not include pending filings. Aggregate figures describe historical dispositions and are not predictions about any specific application or art unit. Individual art-unit performance may differ from the pooled average.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2168
49 APPS · 43% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

43% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION21 / 28 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.6 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.9 moart unit avg 43.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness67% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness33%

Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2169
1 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION0 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY30.7 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Gary J Koo

  • What is Gary J Koo's overall allowance rate?
    42%, based on 50 disposed applications (21 allowed, 29 abandoned). This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    2 art units (2168 and 2169) within Technology Center 2100. The pooled allowance rate aggregates activity across both units.
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from this figure. The rate does not reflect the total number of filings, which includes applications still under examination.
  • What technology area does this examiner work in?
    Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gary J Koo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 50 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP