Examiner Geoffrey R St Leger has allowed 600 of 717 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Geoffrey R St Leger maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 755 total applications, 600 were allowed and 117 abandoned, for a combined disposed count of 717 applications. The allowance rate is 84%, calculated as the percentage of allowed applications among all decided (disposed) applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, 2192. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across that unit and describes the historical record only.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate reflects past outcomes on decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show different rates and warrant independent review.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 343 decided applications with an interview and 374 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Geoffrey R St Leger has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 755 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP