Examiner George C Neurauter Jr has allowed 59 of 105 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
George C Neurauter Jr maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 105 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 59 and abandoned 46. The allowance rate stands at 56% of decided applications. The examiner works within a single art unit (2143). This pooled record reflects outcomes across the examiner's caseload in this technology center and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates all decisions the examiner rendered across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 56% allowance rate describes past dispositions—allowed versus abandoned applications—and reflects the examiner's historical record. Pooled figures do not predict outcomes on individual applications and do not account for variation in application complexity, claim scope, prior art, or prosecution history. Aggregate statistics describe what occurred, not what will occur in any specific case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 60 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner George C Neurauter Jr has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 105 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP