LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GERTRUDE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Gertrude Arthur Jeanglaude

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 55 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2005
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Gertrude Arthur Jeanglaude has allowed 52 of 55 decided applications (95%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

95% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Gertrude Arthur Jeanglaude maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 55 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 52 and abandoned 3, for an allowance rate of 95%. This figure is pooled across a single art unit (2144) and represents decided cases only; pending applications are excluded. The allowance rate is a historical measure of past dispositions and is not a prediction about any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates decisions across art unit(s) within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate reflects the examiner's past dispositions on applications that have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Aggregate figures describe the historical record and are not predictions of outcomes on individual applications. Different applications may face different claim scope, prior art, and examination paths regardless of historical statistics.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
55 APPS · 95% ALLOWANCE
95% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION52 / 3 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION14.9 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY26.9 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Gertrude Arthur Jeanglaude

  • What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?
    The allowance rate is 95%, based on 55 disposed applications (52 allowed, 3 abandoned). This is a historical measure and not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner's record spans 1 art unit (2144) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does this pooled record show?
    The pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art unit(s). It describes the past record only and does not forecast the outcome of any pending or future application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gertrude Arthur Jeanglaude has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 55 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP