LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GILBERTO BARRON JR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Gilberto Barron Jr

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 23 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Gilberto Barron Jr has allowed 7 of 23 decided applications (30%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

30% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Gilberto Barron Jr maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 7 and abandoned 16. This corresponds to an allowance rate of 30% over the decided applications in this art unit. The record spans a single art unit within TC 2100. These figures represent the examiner's pooled historical output and describe outcomes already concluded; they do not forecast results on any pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 30% reflects past dispositions—both allowances and abandonments—across 23 applications that have reached final resolution. Aggregate statistics characterize historical performance and are not predictions for any individual case. Different applications present different facts, claims, and prior art.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
23 APPS · 30% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

30% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION7 / 16 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.4 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.8 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Gilberto Barron Jr

  • What is Gilberto Barron Jr's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 30%, based on 7 allowed applications and 16 abandoned applications out of 23 total disposed applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Gilberto Barron Jr is assigned to 1 art unit (Art Unit 2132) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled record include?
    The pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art units in TC 2100. It includes only disposed (decided) applications and does not include applications still pending.
  • Is this allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate describes past outcomes across 23 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific pending or future application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gilberto Barron Jr has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP