LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GIUSEPPI J GIULIANI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Giuseppi J Giuliani

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 304 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Giuseppi J Giuliani has allowed 185 of 304 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

61% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2165 · 61%AU 2153 · 79%AU 2157 · 22%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Giuseppi J Giuliani has a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 304 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 185, for an allowance rate of 61%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 22% to 79%. This pooled figure represents the aggregate record and does not isolate performance in any single art unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across multiple art units within a technology center. The overall allowance rate of 61% is a historical summary across all decided applications and does not forecast the outcome of any particular case. The range (22% to 79%) reflects variation among individual art units; the aggregate figure masks this variation and describes past dispositions only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2165
225 APPS · 61% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

61% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION138 / 87 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.7 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY42.4 moart unit avg 39.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility42% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)61%
§103 — Obviousness84% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness59%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW63%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW59%+4 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 130 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.

ART UNIT 2153
90 APPS · 79% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

79% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION41 / 11 / 38allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17.1 moart unit avg 27.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.6 moart unit avg 41.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)67%
§103 — Obviousness92% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness62%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW88%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW63%+25 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 33 decided applications with an interview and 19 without.

ART UNIT 2157
27 APPS · 22% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

22% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION6 / 21 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.4 moart unit avg 28 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.5 moart unit avg 46.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility44% · art unit 48%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)59%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 85%
§112 — Written description & definiteness52%

Based on 27 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Giuseppi J Giuliani

  • What is Giuseppi J Giuliani's overall allowance rate?
    61% across 304 disposed applications pooled across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    3 art units within TC 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across the examiner's art units?
    Allowance rates range from 22% to 79% across these art units.
  • Does this pooled rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Giuseppi J Giuliani has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 342 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP