LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GLENFORD J MADAMBA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Glenford J Madamba

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 69 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2009
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Glenford J Madamba has allowed 30 of 69 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

43% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Glenford J Madamba has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 69 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 30 and abandoned 39, for an allowance rate of 43%. This rate is calculated over decided applications only and does not represent a share of all filings. The pooled record reflects the examiner's overall history in this technology center and is a factual summary of past dispositions.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across his art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 43% allowance rate describes the historical ratio of allowed to decided applications. Aggregate figures describe the past record only and are not predictions about any specific application. Allowance rates vary by application, art unit, claim scope, and prior art. A pooled statistic does not forecast the outcome of any individual case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2151
69 APPS · 43% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

43% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION30 / 39 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.5 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.3 moart unit avg 44.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Glenford J Madamba

  • What is Glenford J Madamba's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 43% across 69 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (2151) in TC 2100.
  • What do the allowed and abandoned figures mean?
    Of 69 decided applications, 30 were allowed and 39 were abandoned. Allowance rate is calculated from the allowed count divided by the total disposed count.
  • Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The pooled rate is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application. Outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination details.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Glenford J Madamba has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 69 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP