Examiner Glenn Allen Auve has allowed 1,351 of 1,479 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Glenn Allen Auve has a public record of 1,479 disposed applications across five art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 1,351 were allowed and 128 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 91%. The examiner's allowance rate varies across the art units served, ranging from 88% to 99%. This pooled figure aggregates the record across all five art units and describes the past disposition of applications without predicting outcomes in any individual case.
This profile aggregates data across five art units within TC 2100. A pooled allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical record as a whole and does not break down performance by individual art unit or technology area. The 91% figure describes applications already decided and is not a prediction of how any future application will be examined or disposed.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 82 decided applications with an interview and 571 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 72 decided applications with an interview and 378 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 161 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 112 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Glenn Allen Auve has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,479 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP