Examiner Grace A Park has allowed 477 of 614 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Grace A Park maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 614 decided applications, her pooled allowance rate is 78%. This aggregate figure represents 477 allowed applications and 137 abandonments. The allowance rate varies across her art units, ranging from 70% to 94%. The pooled record reflects work spanning art units 2144, 2157, and 2164, with 658 total applications on file.
A pooled record aggregates allowance data across multiple art units into a single metric. The 78% figure describes past dispositions across all three units combined and does not isolate performance in any individual art unit. Aggregate statistics describe historical outcomes and are not predictions of the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may show different patterns; those details are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 159 decided applications with an interview and 235 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 69 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 51 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Grace A Park has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 658 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP