Examiner Grant M Ford has allowed 18 of 43 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Grant M Ford maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Over 43 disposed applications, Ford's allowance rate stands at 42%, with 18 allowed and 25 abandoned applications. This allowance rate reflects the ratio of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) and does not include pending applications. The rate is calculated across all art units in which he works and represents historical disposal data only.
This pooled record aggregates all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate and other figures describe the examiner's historical record of disposed applications and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail for more granular analysis.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Grant M Ford has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP