LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GRANT M FORD
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Grant M Ford

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 43 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Grant M Ford has allowed 18 of 43 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

42% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Grant M Ford maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Over 43 disposed applications, Ford's allowance rate stands at 42%, with 18 allowed and 25 abandoned applications. This allowance rate reflects the ratio of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) and does not include pending applications. The rate is calculated across all art units in which he works and represents historical disposal data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate and other figures describe the examiner's historical record of disposed applications and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail for more granular analysis.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2141
43 APPS · 42% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

42% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION18 / 25 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION42.6 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.6 moart unit avg 47.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Grant M Ford

  • What is Grant M Ford's overall allowance rate?
    42%, based on 18 allowed applications and 25 abandoned applications out of 43 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    One art unit (2141), all within TC 2100.
  • What does this pooled record represent?
    A historical summary of all disposed applications across the examiner's assigned art units. The figures are correlational and do not predict outcomes for any individual pending application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Grant M Ford has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP