Examiner Greg C Bengzon has allowed 31 of 93 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Greg C Bengzon maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 93 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 31 and abandoned 62, yielding an allowance rate of 33% over the decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, pooled within TC 2100. This rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
This pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units in which the examiner has issued decisions. The allowance rate reflects the share of allowed applications among all decided cases—allowed plus abandoned—and describes past performance. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes for individual applications, which vary based on claim scope, prior art, and application-specific facts.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 51 decided applications with an interview and 42 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Greg C Bengzon has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 93 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP