LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GREGORY A DISTEFANO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Gregory A Distefano

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 573 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Gregory A Distefano has allowed 397 of 573 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

69% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2175 · 65%AU 2174 · 91%AU 2176 · 56%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Gregory A Distefano maintains a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled allowance rate is 69% over 573 decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined). The allowance rate ranges from 56% to 91% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within the technology center. This aggregate profile spans a substantial application portfolio and shows the distribution of outcomes across the art units in which he examines.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates applications across multiple art units into a single profile. The overall allowance rate and counts describe the examiner's historical record and do not predict outcomes in any specific application. Variation across art units—shown in the range—reflects different subject-matter contexts. Aggregate statistics are correlational snapshots; they do not determine the path or result of any individual prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2175
416 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION269 / 147 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24.8 moart unit avg 22.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.9 moart unit avg 37.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility30% · art unit 30%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)56%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness26%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW78%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW58%+20 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 143 decided applications with an interview and 273 without.

ART UNIT 2174
153 APPS · 91% ALLOWANCE
91% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION104 / 10 / 39allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.8 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.5 moart unit avg 42.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility27% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)59%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness26%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW98%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW87%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 69 without.

ART UNIT 2176
43 APPS · 56% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

56% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION24 / 19 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION32.7 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.8 moart unit avg 40.5 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Gregory A Distefano

  • What is Gregory A Distefano's overall allowance rate?
    The overall allowance rate is 69%, based on 573 decided applications (allowed and abandoned) pooled across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The record spans 3 art units: 2174, 2175, and 2176, all within TC 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across his art units?
    The allowance rate ranges from 56% to 91% across the art units in which he examines, reflecting variation in outcomes by art unit.
  • Does this record predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This pooled record describes the examiner's historical outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gregory A Distefano has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 612 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP