Examiner Gregory G Todd

What the data says.

Gregory G Todd maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 34 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 8 and abandoned 26, yielding an allowance rate of 24%. This record spans a single art unit, pooled for analysis. The allowance rate reflects outcomes across decided cases and does not characterize examination of any pending matter. The 24% figure is the sole measure of this examiner's historical allowance record in the technology center.

How to read these numbers.

This page reports the examiner's pooled record—aggregated across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate (24%) and application counts describe past dispositions only and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual application. Pooled figures combine different subject areas and examination circumstances; they show what has occurred, not what will occur in a specific case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Gregory G Todd

• 01What is Gregory G Todd's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 24%, based on 34 disposed applications (8 allowed, 26 abandoned). This is a historical measure of past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The public record covers 1 art unit (2157). The figures are pooled across all art units in which the examiner works.
• 03What does the allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of decided (disposed) applications that were allowed. It reflects the examiner's historical record and does not indicate the outcome of any pending application.
• 04Are these figures predictive of my application?

  No. These figures describe past dispositions only. They are not predictions of any specific application's outcome.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.