Examiner Grigory Gurshman has allowed 21 of 23 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Grigory Gurshman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 decided applications, the examiner allowed 21 and abandoned 2, yielding an allowance rate of 91% over the disposed count. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate represents the proportion of decided applications and does not encompass pending filings. The figures reflect outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.
This pooled record aggregates data across the examiner's art units and reflects historical outcomes. An allowance rate is computed as the share of allowed and abandoned applications among all decided cases, excluding pending work. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Each application turns on its own facts, claims, and arguments.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Grigory Gurshman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP