LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GRIGORY GURSHMAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Grigory Gurshman

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 23 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JAN 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Grigory Gurshman has allowed 21 of 23 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

91% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Grigory Gurshman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 decided applications, the examiner allowed 21 and abandoned 2, yielding an allowance rate of 91% over the disposed count. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate represents the proportion of decided applications and does not encompass pending filings. The figures reflect outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across the examiner's art units and reflects historical outcomes. An allowance rate is computed as the share of allowed and abandoned applications among all decided cases, excluding pending work. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Each application turns on its own facts, claims, and arguments.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
23 APPS · 91% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

91% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION21 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.2 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.7 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Grigory Gurshman

  • What is Grigory Gurshman's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 91%, based on 21 allowed applications and 2 abandoned applications out of 23 total decided applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2132) in Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate measure?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and does not include pending filings. It reflects the proportion of disposed cases that resulted in allowance.
  • Is the allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Grigory Gurshman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP