Examiner Griselle Corbo Roland has allowed 49 of 185 decided applications (26%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Griselle Corbo Roland maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 185 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 49 and abandoned 136, yielding an allowance rate of 26%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and describes the examiner's historical record across the pooled art units. The record does not indicate the outcome of any pending application or serve as a prediction for future dispositions.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 26% allowance rate is calculated from all decided applications in those units combined. Pooled figures describe historical pattern across different subject areas and are not predictions about any individual application. Art-unit-specific records are available separately and may differ from the pooled aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 83 decided applications with an interview and 96 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Griselle Corbo Roland has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 185 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP