LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/GUERRIER MERANT
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Guerrier Merant

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 1,467 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Guerrier Merant has allowed 1,314 of 1,467 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

90% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2117 · 84%AU 2111 · 97%AU 2138 · 33%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Guerrier Merant maintains a public record across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,467 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 90%, with 1,314 allowed and 153 abandoned. The pooled figure reflects work spanning art units 2111, 2117, and 2138. Allowance rates across these art units range from 84% to 97%, indicating variation in outcomes by art unit. This aggregate record describes historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes in any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates three separate art units within TC 2100. The 90% allowance rate represents the combined result across all art units and decided applications. Because different art units may have different allowance rates—ranging here from 84% to 97%—the pooled figure describes past aggregate performance and is not a prediction of how any specific application will be treated. Individual art-unit records are available separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2117
802 APPS · 84% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

84% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 74%
DISPOSITION674 / 128 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.3 moart unit avg 20.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY30.4 moart unit avg 33.2 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility22% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)62%
§103 — Obviousness78% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness48%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW79%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW86%-7 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 189 decided applications with an interview and 613 without.

ART UNIT 2111
718 APPS · 97% ALLOWANCE
97% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 80%
DISPOSITION639 / 23 / 56allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.7 moart unit avg 20.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY22.5 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility15% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)76%
§103 — Obviousness74% · art unit 72%
§112 — Written description & definiteness30%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW99%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW96%+3 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 166 decided applications with an interview and 496 without.

ART UNIT 2138
3 APPS · 33% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

33% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION1 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.9 moart unit avg 19.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY28.5 moart unit avg 32.6 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Guerrier Merant

  • What is Examiner Merant's overall allowance rate?
    Across 1,467 decided applications pooled across three art units, the allowance rate is 90% (1,314 allowed, 153 abandoned).
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The record spans three art units within TC 2100: 2111, 2117, and 2138.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across the art units?
    Allowance rates range from 84% to 97% across the examiner's art units with substantial records. The pooled rate of 90% reflects this variation.
  • Does this pooled rate predict outcomes in my application?
    No. The pooled rate describes historical aggregate dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Guerrier Merant has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,523 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP