Examiner Gwynevere Amelia Deterding has allowed 7 of 7 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Gwynevere Amelia Deterding maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 7 applications, all of which were allowed, for an allowance rate of 100%. The examiner has 29 total applications on record, of which 0 have been abandoned. This pooled figure reflects decided applications only and does not include pending cases. The record spans a single art unit within TC 2100.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, if applicable. This examiner's figures reflect one art unit. The allowance rate describes the proportion of decided applications (allowed or abandoned) and is a historical summary, not a prediction for any individual case. Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. Each application presents distinct facts and claims.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 29 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Gwynevere Amelia Deterding has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 29 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP