Examiner Hai V Nguyen

What the data says.

Examiner Hai V Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 60 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 47%, with 28 allowed and 32 abandoned. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, pooling all decisions into this overall record. The allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific pending or future case.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's assigned art units. The 47% allowance rate reflects historical decisions on completed cases only—pending applications are excluded. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and do not forecast outcomes in any individual application. Different art units may have distinct profiles; pooled statistics mask those variations.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Hai V Nguyen

• 01What is Examiner Nguyen's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 47%, based on 60 disposed applications (28 allowed, 32 abandoned). This describes past decisions only and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Examiner Nguyen's public record spans one art unit (2142). This pooled page reports aggregate figures across all assigned art units.
• 03What does the allowance rate include and exclude?

  The rate covers only decided applications (allowed and abandoned). Pending applications are excluded. The 47% figure does not reflect all filings, only those with a final disposition.
• 04Does this pooled rate apply to my specific application?

  No. This pooled record is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome. Art-unit-specific data may differ from the pooled figure.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.