Examiner Hanh Thi Minh Bui

What the data says.

Examiner Hanh Thi Minh Bui maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 763 total applications, 610 were allowed and 119 abandoned, for a combined disposed total of 729 decided applications. The allowance rate over those decided applications is 84%. This record spans a single art unit, Art Unit 2192, and represents the examiner's pooled output in the technology center.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates all applications decided by this examiner across their assigned art unit(s). The 84% allowance rate describes the past record—the share of decided applications that were allowed—and is calculated from 729 disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned). This aggregate figure does not predict the outcome of any specific application or reflect the disposition of pending cases. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from the pooled rate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines software engineering.

Questions about Examiner Hanh Thi Minh Bui

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 84%, calculated from 729 decided applications (610 allowed plus 119 abandoned). This figure describes the past record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This examiner is assigned to 1 art unit: Art Unit 2192 in TC 2100.
• 03What does the pooled record include?

  The pooled record aggregates all decided applications across all art units assigned to this examiner. It does not include pending applications and represents historical dispositions only.
• 04Can I use this rate to predict my application's outcome?

  No. The aggregate allowance rate is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application. Individual applications depend on claim scope, prior art, arguments, and other case-specific factors.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.