Examiner Hannah A Faye has allowed 104 of 118 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Hannah A Faye maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 118 disposed applications, she allowed 104, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. The allowance rates across her art units range from 85% to 100%. This pooled figure aggregates her record across multiple art units and reflects historical outcomes on decided applications only; it does not represent a prediction for any particular case.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across all their assigned art units into a single overall figure. The 88% allowance rate shown here is the result of combining allowed and abandoned applications across both units. This aggregate describes the examiner's historical disposal record and is not a forecast of the outcome in any specific application. Per-art-unit detail is available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 67 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 26 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hannah A Faye has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 118 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP