LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Hares Jami

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 808 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Hares Jami has allowed 610 of 808 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

76% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2162 · 68%AU 2164 · 98%AU 2169 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Hares Jami's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 808 decided applications, the allowance rate stands at 75%. The allowance rates vary across the examiner's art units, ranging from 68% to 98%. This pooled record aggregates activity across multiple art units and reflects historical disposition data without bearing on any individual pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile presents a pooled record aggregating the examiner's work across three separate art units in TC 2100. The 75% allowance rate describes the proportion of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's cumulative history. The range (68% to 98%) reflects variation among the individual art units but is not linked to any specific art unit in this summary. Pooled figures describe past outcomes and are not predictions of the disposition of any specific application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2162
614 APPS · 68% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

68% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION420 / 194 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21 moart unit avg 23.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.3 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility59% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)39%
§103 — Obviousness95% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness47%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW81%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW51%+30 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 354 decided applications with an interview and 260 without.

ART UNIT 2164
227 APPS · 98% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

98% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 62%
DISPOSITION190 / 3 / 34allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.8 moart unit avg 22.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.2 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility62% · art unit 58%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)38%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness40%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW98%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW99%-1 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 115 decided applications with an interview and 78 without.

ART UNIT 2169
1 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION0 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24.9 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Hares Jami

  • What is Examiner Jami's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 75% across 808 decided applications in the examiner's pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Examiner Jami works across 3 art units (2162, 2164, 2169) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 68% to 98%. This pooled figure does not attribute any specific rate to any named art unit.
  • What does this record predict about my application?
    These figures describe historical dispositions and are not predictions of the outcome of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hares Jami has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 842 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP