Examiner Haresh N Patel

What the data says.

Examiner Haresh N Patel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 130 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 84 and abandoned 46, yielding a 65% allowance rate. This rate describes past decisions on applications brought to final action or abandonment and reflects the examiner's historical record across the pooled art-unit portfolio. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending matters.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate reflects historical outcomes on applications already decided—allowed or abandoned—and is not predictive of any future application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe patterns in past dispositions. Individual applications are examined on their own merits and facts, independent of pooled historical figures.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Haresh N Patel

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 65%, calculated from 130 disposed applications (84 allowed, 46 abandoned). This figure reflects past decisions and is not a prediction for any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate include or exclude?

  The 65% allowance rate includes only decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded. The rate is a historical summary and does not forecast outcomes on any particular case.
• 04What is the technology center focus?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.