Examiner Harrison Li has allowed 14 of 18 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Harrison Li maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 55 total applications, 18 have been disposed (decided). Of those 18 disposed applications, 14 were allowed and 4 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 78% over the decided count. The examiner works within a single art unit (2195). This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending applications and is not predictive of any specific case.
This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 78% allowance rate describes past outcomes on 18 disposed applications and reflects historical data only. Pooled figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application, nor do they account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prosecution history. Each application is examined independently.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Harrison Li has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 55 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP