Examiner Hasanul Mobin has allowed 591 of 776 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Hasanul Mobin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 776 decided applications, the allowance rate is 76%, with 591 allowed and 185 abandoned. The total application count in the record is 804. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record across all art units under their jurisdiction and describes past dispositions only.
This pooled record aggregates applications across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate of 76% is calculated from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Aggregate figures describe the historical record and are not predictions for any individual application. Different art units may have different subject matter and prosecution patterns; pooled data reflects combined outcomes across those units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 491 decided applications with an interview and 285 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hasanul Mobin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 804 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP