Examiner Hassan A Phillips has allowed 45 of 98 decided applications (46%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Hassan A Phillips maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 98 applications. Of those decided applications, 45 were allowed and 53 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 46%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record across all art units within TC 2100 and reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases in that examiner's history.
This record aggregates data across all of the examiner's art units, pooling allowances and abandonments into a single allowance rate. The 46% figure describes the examiner's historical record only—it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled rates average across different art units and subject matters, masking variation within individual units. Individual art-unit records may show different rates. This aggregate data reflects past decisions and does not forecast results in any pending case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 26 decided applications with an interview and 72 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hassan A Phillips has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 98 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP