LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/HASSAN MRABI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Hassan Mrabi

TECH CENTER 2100 · 4 ART UNITS · 504 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 4 ART UNITS

Examiner Hassan Mrabi has allowed 423 of 504 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

84% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2144 · 82%AU 2147 · 89%AU 2176 · 97%AU 2177 · 67%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Hassan Mrabi's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans four art units: 2144, 2147, 2176, and 2177. Across 504 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 84%. Of these decided cases, 423 were allowed and 81 were abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 82% to 97% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates different subject areas within the technology center and represents the examiner's historical record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines data across multiple art units into a single aggregate profile. The overall allowance rate (84% here) describes past outcomes across all four units combined and is not a prediction of any specific application. Because different art units may have different allowance rates, the range (82% to 97%) illustrates this variation. Aggregate statistics reflect historical performance and do not forecast the disposition of any individual case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
364 APPS · 82% ALLOWANCE
82% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION297 / 67 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16.4 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.7 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility32% · art unit 45%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)29%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 92%
§112 — Written description & definiteness29%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW92%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW65%+27 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 228 decided applications with an interview and 136 without.

ART UNIT 2147
143 APPS · 89% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

89% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 44%
DISPOSITION95 / 12 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.5 moart unit avg 29.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35.9 moart unit avg 46.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility63% · art unit 74%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)19%
§103 — Obviousness82% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness25%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW78%+16 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 70 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.

ART UNIT 2176
30 APPS · 97% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

97% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION29 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16.3 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY21.8 moart unit avg 40.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility10% · art unit 41%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)30%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness20%

Based on 30 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2177
3 APPS · 67% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
67% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION2 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.1 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35.4 moart unit avg 40.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility67% · art unit 40%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)33%
§103 — Obviousness67% · art unit 90%
§112 — Written description & definiteness33%

Based on 3 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Hassan Mrabi

  • What is Hassan Mrabi's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 84%, based on 504 disposed applications across all four art units in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Mrabi's record spans four art units: 2144, 2147, 2176, and 2177, all within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. Allowance rates across the art units range from 82% to 97%, showing variation within TC 2100. The 84% overall figure is a pooled average across all four units.
  • What do these statistics predict about my application?
    These figures describe the examiner's past record and are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hassan Mrabi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 540 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP