Examiner Haythim J Alaubaidi has allowed 54 of 73 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Haythim J Alaubaidi has a pooled record of 73 disposed applications across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 54 were allowed and 19 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 67% to 81%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and does not reflect performance on any individual application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate (74% of 73 decided applications) is a historical summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. The range of 67% to 81% shows variation among individual art units but does not indicate which applications will follow which rate. Pooled data reflects past volume and decisions only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Haythim J Alaubaidi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 73 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP