Examiner Hein Jeong has allowed 3 of 25 decided applications (12%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Hein Jeong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across three art units: 2147, 2186, and 2188. Over 25 disposed applications, the examiner issued 3 allowances and 22 abandonments, producing an allowance rate of 12% across the pooled record. This figure represents decided applications only and does not include any pending cases. The record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, and the aggregate allowance rate reflects the examiner's combined output across these units.
This pooled record aggregates Hein Jeong's decisions across three separate art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 12% describes outcomes on 25 decided applications and reflects historical dispositions only. Pooled figures do not account for variation among individual art units, do not predict outcomes in any specific application, and do not indicate how any particular case will be examined or decided. Individual art-unit records provide more granular detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 13 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 8 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 4 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hein Jeong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 25 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP