LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/HELENE R RICE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Helene R Rice

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 22 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Helene R Rice has allowed 4 of 22 decided applications (18%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

18% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Helene R Rice maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 22 disposed applications in art unit 2163, the allowance rate is 18%, with 4 allowed and 18 abandoned applications. This allowance rate reflects outcomes on decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit within TC 2100.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The 18% allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe what occurred historically and remain distinct from any individual application's prosecution. Review of individual art-unit records and case-by-case examination history may provide additional detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2163
22 APPS · 18% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

18% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 64%
DISPOSITION4 / 18 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.6 moart unit avg 23.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY42.5 moart unit avg 40.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Helene R Rice

  • What is Helene R Rice's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 18%, based on 22 disposed applications (4 allowed, 18 abandoned). This rate reflects decided cases only and is not a prediction of any individual application.
  • In how many art units does this examiner work?
    The record spans 1 art unit (2163) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications that were allowed. It describes the examiner's historical record and does not predict outcomes on any pending or future application.
  • What is the technology center?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Helene R Rice has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 22 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP