Examiner Henry K Nguyen has allowed 97 of 167 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Henry K Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 211 total applications, 167 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 167 decided applications, 97 were allowed and 70 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 58%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that art unit and does not predict results for any individual filing.
This is a pooled record aggregating all art units under this examiner's assignment. The 58% allowance rate describes past outcomes among 167 decided applications and reflects the historical distribution of allowances and abandonments. Pooled figures do not break down by individual art unit and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe the record; they do not indicate how any particular case will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 104 decided applications with an interview and 63 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Henry K Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 211 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP