LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/HENRY TRONG NGUYEN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Henry Trong Nguyen

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 22 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2023
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Henry Trong Nguyen has allowed 15 of 22 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

68% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Patent Examiner Henry Trong Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 22 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 15 and abandoned 7, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on decided applications and does not describe pending matters. The figures presented represent historical dispositions and constitute a factual summary of past actions on applications examined by this examiner.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate shown here—68% over 22 decided applications—describes past dispositions and is not a forecast of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units and technologies. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show different rates. Aggregate statistics describe the historical record only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2125
22 APPS · 68% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

68% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 75%
DISPOSITION15 / 7 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.1 moart unit avg 26.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.1 moart unit avg 39 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility64% · art unit 50%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness95% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness64%

Based on 22 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Henry Trong Nguyen

  • What is Henry Trong Nguyen's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 68%, based on 22 disposed applications (15 allowed, 7 abandoned). This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of the outcome for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit, identified as Art Unit 2125, within TC 2100.
  • What technology center does this examiner work in?
    Henry Trong Nguyen examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What do these statistics mean for my application?
    The pooled allowance rate describes past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Each application is examined on its own merits. These figures provide context on the examiner's historical record only.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Henry Trong Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 22 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP