Examiner Herve Iradukunda has allowed 48 of 79 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Herve Iradukunda's public record spans 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 79 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 48 and abandoned 31, for an overall allowance rate of 61%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The pooled figure aggregates work across both art units and reflects the examiner's historical record across the full scope of assigned subject matter.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, creating a single overall statistic. The allowance rate of 61% describes past dispositions and is not predictive of outcomes in any individual application. When an examiner works across different art units, the aggregate figure masks variation between units. For detail on performance within a specific art unit, consult the per-unit breakdown available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Herve Iradukunda has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 79 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP