Examiner Hexing Liu has allowed 142 of 216 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Hexing Liu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 216 disposed applications, 142 were allowed and 74 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 66%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record across both art units and reflects decided applications only; pending cases are excluded from the calculation. The allowance rate represents the share of disposed applications that resulted in allowance rather than abandonment.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's past record and do not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation that may exist between individual art units. Applicants seeking detail about a particular art unit may reference separate per-art-unit data if available. All figures are historical and correlational only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 167 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hexing Liu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 216 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP