Examiner Huen Wong has allowed 221 of 376 decided applications (59%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Huen Wong has a public record spanning 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 376 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 221, for an overall allowance rate of 59%. The allowance rate varies across the art units served, ranging from 14% to 71%. This pooled record aggregates results from multiple distinct art units and reflects the examiner's cumulative history of decisions on applications in this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units, presenting an overall allowance rate rather than unit-specific rates. The aggregate figure describes the examiner's past decisions on disposed applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across art units reflects differences in subject matter and application complexity within the technology center, and individual applications may experience results that differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 130 decided applications with an interview and 44 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 85 decided applications with an interview and 69 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 13 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Huen Wong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 414 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP