Examiner Hugo Molina has allowed 134 of 194 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Hugo Molina's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans one art unit. Over 194 disposed applications, Molina allowed 134 and abandoned 60, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. This rate reflects decisions on applications that have been either allowed or abandoned; pending applications are excluded. The record aggregates decisions across the examiner's assigned art unit and represents historical data only.
A pooled record aggregates all decisions across an examiner's art units into a single allowance rate. This figure describes what has occurred in the past and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics apply to a group of decided cases and do not forecast individual prosecution results. The allowance rate reflects historical disposal patterns, not future performance on any particular filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 143 decided applications with an interview and 51 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hugo Molina has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 194 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP