LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/HUMAIRA ZAHIN MAUNI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Humaira Zahin Mauni

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 21 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Humaira Zahin Mauni has allowed 10 of 21 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

48% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Humaira Zahin Mauni's public record covers 64 total applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 21 disposed applications, 10 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. The remaining disposed applications include 11 abandonments. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled record aggregates outcomes across that art unit and reflects historical disposition data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record presents pooled statistics across all art units in which the examiner has disposed applications. The allowance rate of 48% describes outcomes on 21 decided cases and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures aggregate different art units and subject matters. Historical statistics describe past decisions and do not indicate how any individual application will be examined or decided.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2141
64 APPS · 48% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

48% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION10 / 11 / 43allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.6 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.2 moart unit avg 47.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility89% · art unit 49%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)98%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 91%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Humaira Zahin Mauni

  • What is Examiner Mauni's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 48%, calculated from 10 allowed applications among 21 total disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This record spans 1 art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual results depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination of the specific record.
  • What is included in the 'disposed' count?
    Disposed applications include those allowed and those abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from the disposed count and allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Humaira Zahin Mauni has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 64 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP