Examiner Hung D Le has allowed 1,126 of 1,250 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Hung D Le maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit (2161), the examiner has disposed of 1,250 applications. Of those decided applications, 1,126 were allowed and 124 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 90%. The record spans 1,297 total applications received. These figures represent the examiner's pooled historical record and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This record is pooled across all art units under the examiner's purview. When an examiner manages multiple art units, the aggregate allowance rate and disposal counts reflect a blend of examination activity across different subject-matter areas. The figures shown here describe what has occurred in the past and are correlational data—they are not predictive of outcomes in any specific case. Individual applications may experience different patterns based on claim scope, prior art, and other case-specific factors.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 260 decided applications with an interview and 990 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hung D Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,297 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP