Examiner Hung T Vy has allowed 1,096 of 1,273 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Hung T Vy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 1,273 decided applications, the examiner issued allowances in 1,096 cases, yielding an 86% allowance rate. An additional 177 applications were abandoned. The examiner's pooled record reflects decisions on 1,305 total applications filed. This aggregate figure spans a single art unit and describes the examiner's historical disposition on decided matters.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across one art unit within TC 2100. The 86% allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that received allowance, calculated from the 1,273 applications on which final action was taken. Pooled figures reflect past outcomes and do not predict the disposition of any specific application. Art-unit-specific records and prosecution details are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 496 decided applications with an interview and 777 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hung T Vy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,305 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP