Examiner Hussein A El Chanti has allowed 69 of 107 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Hussein A El Chanti has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 107 disposed applications in art unit 2157, the allowance rate stands at 64%, with 69 applications allowed and 38 abandoned. This rate is calculated from all decided applications in the pooled record and does not account for pending matters. The examiner works within a single art unit, meaning the aggregate figures reflect activity in one classification area within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The 64% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on decided cases and is a statistical summary of past work, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures reflect volume and disposition patterns; they do not indicate how any individual application will be handled or what the examiner prioritizes in examination.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 17 decided applications with an interview and 90 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hussein A El Chanti has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 107 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP