Examiner Huy Duong has allowed 121 of 173 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Huy Duong maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 173 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 121 cases, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This rate reflects decided applications only—allowed and abandoned combined—and excludes pending matters. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 59% to 81%, reflecting variation in the record by individual art unit. The examiner has handled 221 total applications, of which 52 were abandoned.
This record pools data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The aggregate allowance rate of 70% describes the examiner's historical disposition of decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may show different rates. Pooled figures provide context on the examiner's overall record; they do not forecast results in any particular prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 36 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 56 decided applications with an interview and 31 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Huy Duong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 221 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP