Examiner Hyungjun B Yi has allowed 5 of 19 decided applications (26%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Hyungjun B Yi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a total of 65 applications, 19 have been disposed (decided). Of those disposed applications, 5 were allowed and 14 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 26% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit, 2146. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications handled in that art unit and does not predict results on any individual pending application.
This profile aggregates all applications and outcomes across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate of 26% describes the share of decided applications that were allowed in the past and reflects the examiner's historical record only. Pooled figures do not account for variation among specific art units, application characteristics, or individual claim scope. Past rates are not predictions of future prosecution outcomes on any specific application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Hyungjun B Yi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 65 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP