Examiner I Chan Yang has allowed 35 of 51 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner I Chan Yang's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 51 disposed applications, 35 were allowed and 16 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. This rate represents decisions on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending cases. The examiner's record is drawn from a single art unit, meaning the figures reflect a pooled decision history within one classification group rather than aggregation across multiple distinct areas.
A pooled record aggregates all applications and dispositions across the examiner's assigned art units. The allowance rate—here 69% over 51 decided cases—describes historical outcomes and is not a prediction for any individual application. Different art units within TC 2100 may carry distinct complexity or prosecution patterns. Pooled figures offer a statistical snapshot of past decisions; they do not forecast results on a specific filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner I Chan Yang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP