Examiner Ibrahim Rahman

What the data says.

Ibrahim Rahman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. Across 45 total applications, 11 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). The allowance rate on decided applications is 0%, reflecting zero allowed applications among the 11 disposed cases. Eleven applications remain abandoned in the disposed count. The record covers a defined subset of prosecutions within TC 2100 and describes outcomes already concluded.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here is a historical summary—the percentage of applications that received a final approval among all decided cases. This figure describes past dispositions and is not a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate rates reflect many variables and do not forecast outcomes in individual matters.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Ibrahim Rahman

• 01What is Ibrahim Rahman's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 0% on 11 decided applications in the pooled record. This reflects zero allowances among disposed cases and is a summary of concluded prosecutions only.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  The record covers one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03What does a 0% allowance rate mean for my application?

  The pooled allowance rate describes historical outcomes across many applications already decided. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not account for individual claim language, prior art, or prosecution strategy.
• 04How many applications are included in this record?

  The examiner has 45 total applications on record, of which 11 have been disposed (decided). Thirty-four remain pending.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.