Examiner Idriss N Alrobaye has allowed 205 of 280 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Idriss N Alrobaye maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 280 decided applications, the examiner issued allowances in 205 cases, for an allowance rate of 73%. Seventy-five applications were abandoned. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 63% to 74%. This pooled figure represents aggregate dispositions and does not forecast any individual application's outcome.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units. The overall allowance rate of 73% reflects decisions already made on 280 applications and describes past dispositions, not future results. Pooled statistics obscure variation among art units—the range shown (63% to 74%) indicates that individual art-unit records differ. Historical figures are correlational and do not predict the path of any pending case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 100 decided applications with an interview and 153 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Based on 44 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Idriss N Alrobaye has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 297 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP